Who are the houses for?According to YIMBY Action, the country’s “housing shortage is a result of harmful laws passed at all levels of government,” and pushing for better housing solutions is a way to “reduce poverty, end homelessness, eliminate racial segregation, create jobs, and stop climate change.” While all of that sounds good, housing justice activists argue that YIMBYs have co-opted their messaging, but aren’t doing the same work. In California, activists have stressed that legislation that fails to require affordable housing to low-income residents, bypasses environmental regulation in the name of “efficiency,” and does not guarantee the use of union labor, will only benefit developers and landlords, rather than the people who need housing. In the Phoenix area, historic neighborhoods are concerned that the new law to allow ADUs and “middle housing” (duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes and townhomes) on single-family lots will allow developers to tear down historic homes without guaranteeing affordability. As one neighbor told the local press, “I would love affordable housing in this neighborhood, but we're not developing affordable housing. We're building fourplexes, most likely market and luxury units.” A 2021 journal article called YIMBY the “latest frontier of gentrification,” and many opponents of the movement have stressed that economic inequality is at the heart of housing problems, not constraints on construction. |
No comments:
Post a Comment